It’s down to us but most importantly, it’s down to YOU!

The point of our project at South Essex Radical Media (SERM) with our publications, The South Essex Stirrer and The Estuary Alternative, and our alliance with Basildon & Southend Housing Action (BASHA) is simple – to inspire, encourage and support people to take action at the grassroots in order to bring about meaningful change.

SERM is basically about propaganda. It’s our job to report on what we see across the region we cover and, not just point out what’s wrong but to stir people up to start acting collectively to bring about change. BASHA are community and housing activists. As well as holding Basildon Council to account for their repeated failings, they aim to encourage residents and tenants on the estates to start taking collective action to bring about change.

This is why we and BASHA support and facilitate the work of groups such as the Vange Hill Community Group (VHCG) and help to facilitate actions such as this: Doing it for ourselves on the ¾ estate in Vange It’s not for us to tell VHCG what to do – their supporters live on the estate and know exactly what needs to be done! All we do is provide logistical support and some equipment on clean up days and help them to produce their propaganda. We hope that what VHCG do will act as an example to other estates and inspire people to start collectively taking action.

With The Estuary Alternative, the ultimate aim is to hand the project over to grassroots activists in the region while we move on to other initiatives. As stated in this piece: The future of this project… we don’t want to be lumbered with the job of finding content for it for ever and a day. The aim of The Estuary Alternative is to foster a greater degree of communication and co-operation between and among the range of grassroots groups operating in the region. That means that ultimately, it has to end up as a collective, collaborative project…

There are only a few of us and we have to be focused on what we can achieve with what are limited resources. Running The South Essex Stirrer and the On Uncertain Ground blogs (and the paper) takes up a lot of our time and energy which is why when we launch an initiative such as The Estuary Alternative, we really do want other grassroots activists to eventually take it off our hands!

It’s the same with BASHA, there are only a few of them and they want to focus on their roles of a) holding Basildon Council to account and b) facilitating and supporting grassroots groups and activists on the estates. They are not a back up service to be called upon when the roads haven’t been gritted or the rubbish hasn’t been collected. If residents and tenants want to act together to deal with issues like this, BASHA will happily support and facilitate them but they’re not going to do the bloody job for them!

We’ve had a fair few discussions about this dilemma that we’re facing and why people look to us to do stuff rather than them collectively doing it for themselves. There’s no single answer to this…

In the case of BASHA, on a growing number of estates, it’s a toxic cocktail of factors such as a general collapse of morale in the face of austerity plus demographic reasons such as the growing number of buy to let landlords and houses of multiple occupation leading to a constant churn in the population. Atomisation isn’t just a word bandied about by sociologists in academia – it’s the brutal reality we increasingly find on the estates.

With SERM, our biggest headache is getting other people to write for our blogs. We do get a few guest pieces for which we are incredibly grateful but we still have to do a lot of the legwork in terms of sourcing content. To broaden our reach we’re increasingly using re-blogs and cut and pasting media releases from groups we trust but it’s no substitute for having a rota of regular contributors. With all of our publications, we really want to open them up to as many individual groups and activists as possible to make them truly representative of what’s going on.

Drawing to a conclusion, it seems that we are up against the evils of demoralisation and atomisation on the estates and a worrying degree of complacency in a number of grassroots groups who seem happy to plod along doing the same old thing rather than reach out, link up and step up a gear. Going into what is looking to be a turbulent and unpredictable 2018, we’re going to need as much solidarity as can be mustered to deal with the onslaught that’s coming our way.

We don’t pretend to have the answers to this dilemma by any stretch of the imagination. We’re more than happy to listen to what other people have to say on the problems of demoralisation, atomisation and passivity and how they think they can be overcome. We admit that this piece can be seen as us venting some of our frustrations! Having said that, the intention is to foster a constructive discussion on how we can move forward and get ourselves into a position where we can deal with whatever 2018 throws at us…


Bookfair diary

We’ve just started a Bookfair diary – – on this blog. The aim of this diary is to promote the growing number of regional anarchist / radical bookfairs that are taking place across the British Isles. With the London Anarchist Bookfair collective saying they won’t be organising one in 2018, the focus will be shifting to what’s going on in the regions. No two bookfairs are the same and we’re pretty sure that once the diary starts to fill up, there will be an interesting variety of events to attend, support, help to build and participate in. We recognise that the London Anarchist Bookfair had grown to an international event and it will be missed. However, there’s plenty of life outside of London and we want to do our level best to help promote that…

If you’re involved in organising an anarchist / radical bookfair anywhere across the British Isles in 2018, get in touch with us here – – with the relevant details and we’ll put them up on diary page with a booster post on the front page of this blog as well.

Getting on with it…

One of the problems with anarchism are certain elements who are only too willing to criticise comrades involved in campaigns, grassroots community projects, actions and the like but who never seem to get out and do anything themselves. This post is a celebration of people and groups who just go out and get on with stuff – people and groups we’ll do our level best to support. Before we go any further, here’s a little warning… Some of those mentioned are not political in any way shape or form – they’re just local residents frustrated at the inaction of their local councils and who’ve decided to take matters into their own hands…

A couple of us volunteer as gardeners at the community run Hardie Park in Stanford-le-Hope – We remember what it was like back in 2007 and 2008 when we contested the Stanford East & Corringham Town ward for the Independent Working Class Association. It was a litter strewn, unloved no go area that most local people tried to avoid. Now, it’s a much loved, well used community asset although as the volunteers will admit, there’s still a lot more that needs to be done to bring the park up to the standard we’d like! The point is that now the park is being well maintained, more people are using it and with the volunteer run cafe, it’s becoming a hub for the local community. The benefits of this in health and well being are plain for all to see.

The residents who’ve taken over the running of Hardie Park wouldn’t see themselves as having an overt political agenda – all they want is a park that’s a valuable community asset. Yes, there’s a bit of a hierarchy with the running of the park and we know anarcho purists would hate it. As far as we’re concerned it’s a) a project that has made a tangible difference to the quality of life in Stanford-le-Hope and b) in it’s own way, it’s bringing aspects of running a community asset closer to the grassroots. That ticks enough boxes for us to actively support it.

Then there’s the Billericay Community Garden This was started by a small group of local residents on a patch of overgrown ground behind a vicarage. The aim of the project is to get locals interested in growing their own food with as little impact on the environment as possible – the emphasis is very much on the organic. Along with our friends at Basildon & Southend Housing Action, we helped them in their first year with the donkey work at the site and advising them on setting up a committee. It’s a project that’s had a few ups and downs but at the moment, as you can see from the photos on their Facebook page, it’s thriving.

Southend…it must be something in the air because there’s a lot going on down there… It’s about people seeing a problem and rather than waiting for someone else to deal with it, they get on and fix it themselves. In a similar, organic gardening vein to the above, there’s the Southend in Transition Community Allotment Promoting repair and re-use as opposed to chucking stuff in the bin when it breaks, here’s the SouthMenders Southend Repair Cafe Southend Little Free Pantry in their own words ‘is a place where members of our community can come to help themselves to a few groceries to help them through a time of need, whether it is financially or mobility impaired. It is also there as a judgement free space where people can share what they don’t need and possibly exchange for something they *are* in need of.’ These are just some of the people we worked with towards the end of last year going into this one to build the Southend Radical Fair that took place at The Railway on Saturday May 8th.

For a full list of local groups who get things done, take a look at the sidebar of The Estuary Alternative blog which is our sister project created specifically to support and promote positive initiatives along the Thames estuary – All of the above groups in their own individual ways are playing a part in building a new, better world inside the decaying, dysfunctional one we currently endure. We’re proud to do what we can to offer our support to these initiatives. Sure, a lot of them wouldn’t satisfy the demanding criteria of the nitpicking, purist element of what passes for an anarchist movement these days. Tough… To be honest, we much prefer to deal with the above mentioned who get things done rather than some elements in the anarchist movement who just give us a sodding headache.

We’ve been working closely with Basildon & Southend Housing Action (BASHA) since the early part of 2014. A lot of that work is hands on practical work on the estates. That means the community clean ups and gardening we’ve done on Nursery Gardens in Laindon, the Pattocks and on the ¾ estate in Vange. This is what BASHA did working alongside members of the local community at the Pattocks: Cleaning up the Pattocks It’s working alongside members of the community who care about their estates, are pissed off with being brushed off by Basildon Council and have taken it upon themselves to make a practical difference. We do wonder if some of our anarcho critics would like an afternoon of strimming, fishing used nappies out of dense undergrowth, unblocking street drains and the like, bagging all of the trash up and taking it down to the tip… If any of them do fancy a change, they’re more than welcome to get in touch and come down for the next clean up.

Recently, us and BASHA have teamed up with the Vange Hill Community Group (VHCG) who are working their butts off to improve conditions on the ¾ estate in Vange. This is exactly the kind of grassroots group we want to see on the estates – if every estate in Basildon had a group like this, there would be some changes! What we do is support, advise and facilitate the work of VHCG. This is just one of many posts we’ve put up on the South Essex Stirrer highlighting the issues and the shite VHCG and BASHA have to deal with: Silenced

We do get into London on occasions but…we pick and choose who we support. The criteria is supporting groups that get stuff done. One of them is Focus E15 Mothers We’ve attended a few of their weekly stalls on Stratford Broadway and have marched with them on some of their protests as well: Marching from tower to tower With Newham Council and the housing associations they use dumping their residents in places such as Pitsea away from family, friends and support network, we have a shared interest in supporting Focus E15 Mothers. We can’t for the life of us understand why they’re not listed on the back page of Rebel City, the paper that supports a number (but not all) of the radical groups in London. Oh hang on, we do know…it’s because the work of Focus E15 Mothers is facilitated by the Revolutionary Communist group. The wrong ‘ism’ so despite the importance of the work of Focus E15 Mothers, they don’t get a look in at the moment. This is the kind of anarcho purist sectarianism that does our sodding heads in!

Last but by no means least, there are our mates from Class War As and when we can get into London, we’ve supported their protests ranging from the weekly ‘No Poor Doors’ pickets a few years ago outside the One Commercial Street development in Aldgate to the ongoing actions outside the sick abomination that’s the Jack the Ripper ‘museum’ on Cable Street. For obvious security reasons, we don’t want to go into too much detail about what we get up to with them but suffice to say they make their point, they’re fun and they know what comradeship is about…

That’s it and that’s us…getting on with it and supporting a diverse range of groups who do the same. As you will have gathered from reading the above, we’re not purists – we happily support any radical / alternative / grassroots groups that are willing to get stuck in and get results. They’re not perfect but if they’re travelling in the same broad direction of travel, we’ll back them. Come to think of it we’re not perfect but we’re happy to listen to constructive criticism and learn lessons from our mistakes…

Enough is enough…

On the evening on July 19th, I attended the protest organised by Justice 4 Grenfell outside Kensington Town Hall where the council were having their first full meeting since the Grenfell Tower disaster on June 14th: Elizabeth Campbell: New council leader in charge of Grenfell Tower disaster not resigning ‘yet’ after furious backlash As soon as I arrived at the protest, the first thing I saw was the inevitable SWP stall strategically placed at the entrance to the piazza at the side of the town hall. This meant that pretty much everyone who wanted to attend the protest or watch the live feed of the council meeting being shown on the big screen at the back of the piazza had to walk past the SWP stall and their paper hawkers.

It was the same at the People’s Assembly Tories Out! ‘protest’ that took place on Saturday 1st July – the first thing I saw was the inevitable SWP red gazebos, paper sellers everywhere and thousands of their sodding placards. Going back to the People’s Assembly ‘protest’ in Parliament Square on June 10th, the first Saturday after the general election and again, the first thing I saw was the red SWP gazebos, paper sellers and hundreds of their placards. The key themes of both of these ‘protests’ was ensuring that they ran to a pre-determined script with loads of speeches, musical ‘entertainment’ and choreographed chanting. All enforced by the likes of the SWP, union bureaucrats, Momentum activists and various Trot hangers on. Enforced to the point where these hacks were more than happy to ask the cops to arrest comrades who didn’t want to stick to their script…

When it comes to the big set pieces organised by the likes of the People’s Assembly, the inevitable presence of the SWP / Trots seems to have been accepted as a given. Fortunately, these big set pieces aren’t the only game in town and there are other campaigns and groups achieving results on their own terms. In no particular order, here are a few examples of what can be and is being achieved… United Voices Of The World union who amongst other fights have chalked up yet another victory with the reinstatement of a sacked cleaner at the London School of Economics – the fifth one they’ve got reinstated in a year – Focus E15 who have been tirelessly fighting to expose and challenge the shameful record of Newham Council on social cleansing –

What riles me is the way the SWP / Trots blatantly try to hi-jack legitimate campaigns. When there have been local protests in London, particularly over housing issues, as was seen in Haringey on the evening of Monday 3rd July when there was a protest against the implementation of the Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV), the likes of the SWP have been all over them trying to co-opt and control what’s happening. One activist from an estate facing obliteration by the HDV took one look at the assembled SWP members as the march was forming up, took the principled decision he didn’t want to be associated with them in any way, shape or form, got back on his bike and rode away.

What really sticks in the craws of a lot of people is the way the SWP / Trots have been trying to latch onto the Grenfell Tower disaster. From what I’ve heard, their attempts to do that in the immediate neighbourhood of Grenfell Tower have been rebuffed by locals who can see their agenda for what it is and rightly want nothing to do with a bunch of shameless political opportunists. However, that did not stop the SWP / Trots from doing their level best with the Justice 4 Grenfell protest on 19th July to try and dictate what was going to happen that night. This was apparent from their organising a rota of speakers that wasn’t exactly representative of the local community around Grenfell Tower through to heavy censorship and deletion of posts and threads on the Facebook page promoting the event. Not to mention their organisers openly talking to the cops and pointing out individuals whose presence they were unhappy about…

Fortunately there were people and groups there who weren’t buying the SWP / Trot agenda and who set up an open mike on the steps leading up to the town hall. This allowed locals from the estate to have their say as well as housing campaigners from the RCG, Class War and Movement For Justice to name a few. In effect, there were two rallies going on side by side for a period… After a while, I went over to the piazza where the proceedings from the council chamber were being broadcast and survivors from Grenfell Tower and residents from the surrounding estates were allowed to speak to the council. The contrast between the dignity, passion and rightful anger of the survivors speaking in the chamber and the shameless opportunism of the SWP skulking around outside trying to flog their papers couldn’t have been starker. By the time I had to leave, the SWP had pretty much given up and were departing, leaving people mainly from the Grenfell Tower area to continue to watch the proceedings from the council chamber. That to me speaks volumes and offers some hope for the future…

From what I’ve seen and heard of the survivors from Grenfell Tower and residents from the surrounding estates, I can’t see them tolerating the likes of the SWP / Trots attempting to muscle their way in and hi-jack their fight for justice. The SWP / Trots are in their comfort zone when it comes to co-opting protests – out on the estates, it’s a completely different matter. When people on the estates start to fully comprehend the threat posed to them by social cleansing, they won’t have time for an SWP / Trot agenda of getting Jeremy Corbyn elected as PM and a strategy of trying to keep the lid on simmering social tensions until that happens. Offering solidarity to the people on the estates and where necessary, facilitating them to get get their voices heard and build effective resistance networks is a way forward that will bring about a meaningful challenge to the system…

The SWP / Trots are currently standing in the way of building a genuine challenge to the system. With creative thinking plus some hard graft on the estates, it’s possible to bypass their stifling, stale agenda and build a grassroots movement that has a real sense of its own autonomy and strength. Recent events where it feels as though the SWP / Trots have swamped everything may have left us feeling dispirited but, when you stand back and take a look at the situation, there are openings where grassroots campaigns can bypass them and dump them in the dustbin of history…

Dave (the editor)

The toxic impact of the cult of Corbyn

The People’s Assembly organised Tories Out! protest that took place on Saturday 1st July was to all intents and purposes, a Jeremy Corbyn love-fest. Apart from Class War, Plan C and a few other independently minded groups and individuals, the vast majority of the attendees at the march were there for the uncritical worship of Jeremy Corbyn. For the record, Class War left the march at the halfway point, unable to bear listening to one more chorus of ‘Oh, Jeremy Corbyn!’ without losing it, to retire to a pub for a drink and to hatch a plan for an intervention at Parliament Square later on in the proceedings: Oh, Jeremy Corbyn! The People’s Assembly

The aim of the intervention was to publicly challenge Corbyn on the record of London Labour councils on social cleansing carried out in the name of ‘re-generation’. For the record, I was one of the small group of Class War activists that carried out the intervention at the back of the stage in Parliament Square. A chance encounter with Len McCluskey as he departed from the back of the stage after speaking was a fortuitous bonus in that it prompted us to kickstart the intervention – he was vigorously challenged on the record of London Labour councils. The reaction of the assembled crowd at the back of the stage to the intervention was mixed – it didn’t turn into the lynch mob I was expecting. There were a number of people who while they disagreed strongly with the aim and tone of the intervention, rather than simply hurl abuse, did engage in some heated arguments with us – fair enough, heated arguments are what I thrive on! There were also enough curious bystanders to accept copies of the Class War paper when I decided to do an impromptu paper distribution while we were waiting for the Messiah in the form of Corbyn to turn up.

However, there were some fanatical Corbynistas who not only refused to engage with us but actively tried to drown us out by singing ‘Oh, Jeremy Corbyn!’ over and over again. It was at this point that the irrationality of the cult of Corbyn really started to hit home with a vengeance. The more fanatical element don’t see the need to engage in any form of debate or argument – all they do is endlessly repeat the name of their beloved leader. Once Corbyn rocked up behind the stage and we’d conducted the final part of our intervention, we then swiftly departed to return to the pub. We walked past Parliament Square at the the precise moment that Corbyn made his appearance on the stage. The chorus of ‘Oh, Jeremy Corbyn!’ from the assembled crowd seemed to reach a new, feverish height. While we were buzzing from the intervention we had made, at the same time, there was a disconcerting unease at the uncritical irrationality of the cult like worship of one individual.

Here we are in the 21st century and we’ve witnessed a square full of mainly well educated, predominantly middle class people singing the name of their hero over and over again. We’re talking about people, many of whom have been through higher education and university and supposedly imbued with the gift of critical thinking, mindlessly singing the name of their political hero. I know we’re living in what could be described as ‘interesting times’ but the level of irrationality that’s characterising politics is profoundly disturbing. We’ve seen the irrationality of the right at the Trump rallies during the US presidential elections last year and the scary slide towards ethno-nationalism across Europe. The left were incredibly vocal at the time in their condemnation of the mob mentality that was coming to the fore at some of the Trump rallies. Well, with the increasingly irrational, uncritical atmosphere at the Corbyn rallies over here, it’s becoming a case of the pot calling the kettle black!

The problem with the Corbynistas is that despite being presented with ample evidence of the complicity of London Labour councils in social cleansing, they’re in denial about it. Blind belief is over-riding thoroughly researched, fact based evidence. Even when Corbyn supporters acknowledge there’s a problem, they blame it on the Progress / Blairite faction of the party while claiming that it’s only Corbyn that has the power to purge these elements and thus put an end to the policies. The point is that Corbyn is well aware of what’s going on and in a cynical bid to gain power, he’s attempting to sweep the dismal record of London Labour councils under the carpet. Which may explain his extreme discomfort at being confronted with this record by a Class War activist on Saturday July 1st. As for what Corbyn really knows, we’ll leave it for our associates at Architects 4 Social Housing to explain in forensic detail: Jeremy Corbyn and the Haringey Development Vehicle

The obsession with Corbyn has gone a fair way to neutering radical action on the streets as a worrying number of so called radicals seem to be placing their faith in him eventually triumphing at the ballot box. Apart from the choreographed demonstration we witnessed on July 1st, independent, autonomous street actions seem to be few and far between these days. When there have been local protests in London, particularly over housing issues, as was seen in Haringey on the evening of Monday 3rd July when there was a protest against the implementation of the Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV), the likes of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) are all over them trying to co-opt and control what’s happening. One activist from an estate facing obliteration by the HDV took one look at the assembled SWP members as the march was forming up, took the principled decision he didn’t want to be associated with them in any way, shape or form, got back on his bike and rode away.

Every time the SWP co-opt a protest, they effectively throw a fire safety blanket over it, stifling any real anger that may lead to things getting out of control (for them). This is happening because the SWP have taken on board the agenda of supporting Corbyn, so as far as they’re concerned, any protest on housing issues in London has to be co-opted and managed by them to keep it on message and to stop the truth coming out. Not being based in London, I’m not up to speed on the exact details of what’s going on the estates across the capital that are under threat from ‘re-generation’. What I have managed to gather is that while the likes of the SWP and the Corbynistas are trying to co-opt and ‘manage’ resistance to estate demolition, many of the people on the estates are not buying it. This leaves some hope that genuinely, independent, autonomous and militant campaigns will start to prevail at some point.

What has to be born in mind is that the seemingly uncritical hero worship of Corbyn and the antics of the likes of the SWP is taking place inside an activist bubble. It’s an activist bubble that’s not even reaching the vast majority of residents on the estates in London who are threatened by ‘re-generation’. There’s a political vacuum here that needs to be filled… When you get out to the estates of Thurrock and Basildon where I operate, it’s a welcome reality check in that hardly anyone is talking about Corbyn and the SWP are non-existent! However, while on the one hand it’s refreshing to have a reality check, on the other, it’s an indication that there is a massive political vacuum that is waiting to be filled and there are plenty of the wrong elements around who would like to fill it. Which is why, in conjunction with comrades from Basildon & Southend Housing Action, we’ve produced this flyer to explain the realities of the housing crisis to folk out here…

With the Corbynistas and the Trots of the SWP, when it comes to operating in London, it’s hard to try and carve out an independent space we can operate in. In their own way, Class War and Plan C made a decent attempt to do that at the Tories Out! Protest on Saturday 1st July. It did occur to me that with the Class War intervention, given the hostility to the Corbynistas and Trots surrounding us, it was almost felt like we were counter-demonstrators who had managed to infiltrate the protest! It did lead me to wonder at what stage do we simply launch our own counter protest rather than bother to join another People’s Assembly point A to point B affair? Suffice to say, some serious and creative thinking on strategy and tactics is needed to enable genuine radicalism to carve out the space it needs to get its voice heard and to mobilise people into action.

Dave (the editor)

We are where we are…

On Saturday 10th June, the day after it became clear that Theresa May was seeking an arrangement with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) who operate in the occupied six counties in the north of Ireland, to prop up her ailing and battered government, the People’s Assembly held a ‘celebration’ event in Parliament Square. You don’t have to dig too deep to find out how reactionary and downright dodgy the DUP are: So, who are the DUP? In the circles we move in, there’s a visceral sense of rage at the DUP being invited to prop up a failing regime…

The People’s Assembly seemed to think that inviting people to Parliament Square to laze about in the early summer sun, listening to feelgood speeches and music while basking in the glow of Corbyn’s election campaign coming closer to nicking a result than many people thought was possible, was the best response to situation. Fortunately there were a few anti-fascist comrades at the event who were not content to laze about in the sun for the entire afternoon and who launched themselves onto Whitehall, suprisingly pulling about two thirds of the crowd with them to march up to Downing Street, onto Trafalgar Square and then back down to Parliament Square. When the protesters got back to Parliament Square, the MC on the People’s Assembly stage gave them a guarded welcome back but you could sense some irritation at people departing from the script.

This piece below is from our comrades in Class War and kind of sums up where we are:

Corbyn’s success means an end to mass protest on the streets.

Corbyn is relying on an obscure Commons procedures to get him into power when he could have called mass rallies. If that don’t work it’ll be the patient ‘one more heave strategy’ – win in 2022 so behave till then. No more will comrade McCluskey be fulminating in Hyde Park, nor the Trots who have their snouts in the trough, be patient comrades….be patient…

In this light it is well to read what SOLIDARITY wrote way back:

Meaningful action, for revolutionaries, is whatever increases the confidence, the autonomy, the initiative, the participation, the solidarity, the equalitarian tendencies and the self-activity of the masses and whatever assists in their demystification. Sterile and harmful action is whatever reinforces the passivity of the masses, their apathy, their cynicism, their differentiation through hierarchy, their alienation, their reliance on others to do things for them and the degree to which they can therefore be manipulated by others – even by those allegedly acting on their behalf.

What Saturday 10th June showed was that yet again, the Trots are acting as a fire safety blanket when it comes to protests on the streets, doing their level best to take any heat and visceral anger out of the situation. Here we are at the start of a major constitutional, political and eventually an economic and social crisis as events unfold, with a government looking to a bunch of quasi-fascists to prop them up, and the response of the organised left is to encourage people to laze around on the grass in Parliament Square feeling good about themselves. If there are to be any demonstrations on the streets, it seems they will be strictly on the terms of the organised left to the point where they will (continue to) be working hand in hand with the cops to police protest and flush out any militant, disruptive elements.

All of this is in the name of not rocking the boat and ensuring that Corbyn can either get into power if May’s attempts at propping up the government fall apart or play the long game and work for a victory in 2022. The stance of the organised left is based on the naïve assumption that the financial sector and the security and military establishment will happily roll over and accept a Corbyn government. There are elements who would not accept this: Unfriendly fire: would a Corbyn government lead to a military revolt? People, please wise up – a change of strategy and tactics is needed!

Even within anarchist circles, there have been some who were swept up with the excitement of the Corbyn campaign and not only said they would vote but were hectoring the rest of us to do so as well! Suffice to say, the debates and rows this triggered have not done the movement any favours at a time when we need as much unity and militancy as possible. However, what’s been done and said can’t be undone and we have to move on from this. Part of that process means finding a way of making the anarchist critique of the state more accessible to a wider audience…

There’s a massive body of literature out there about the role of the state and it has to be said that there are some people on the fringes of anarchism who would do well to re-read and discuss that work. If anyone wants to offer suitable readings on anarchism and the state that we can put into a reading list for future reference, please feel free to send them in to us (contact details can be found in About). For the moment, we’ll leave you with this one as a starter: B.2 Why are anarchists against the state?

The rise of Corbynism is making many so called radical people think that the state is a neutral body that can be reformed and changed for the good of all if the right political party is in power, as opposed to the protection of vested interests. The intrinsic role of the state in maintaining the conditions for capitalism to carry on doesn’t seem to be registering in the minds of a lot of activists. The state can only survive and continue to carry out its role of maintaining capitalism because it’s backed by the threat of force. Should the current constitutional, political and eventually economic and social crisis get out of control, many activists may well be learning the lesson of the state using force to maintain the status quo the hard way.

When it comes to an understanding of exactly what the state is, we need to get our act together to ensure there’s no more backsliding into Corbynism by people purporting to be anarchists. We also need to find a way of mediating our critique of the state in an accessible and jargon free way to reach out to a wider audience. Last but by no means least, we need to get out on the streets in numbers before it’s too late!

Some thoughts on the Net, social media & activism

The aim of this piece is to start a discussion about the pros and cons of the use of the Net and social media in activism. This has been prompted by concerns about an over reliance on digital communication and a decline in face to face, real life interactions which are still essential in building the sense of loyalty and comradeship needed in activism. It has also been prompted by security concerns where there have been examples of the authorities shutting down actions before they even start because they’ve been promoted on social media instead of built by word of mouth. This is not a definitive piece and is open to revision and expansion as the discussion about the points raised in it proceeds…

The positives…

The Net and social media are tools which if used with due consideration, are incredibly useful. With your critical faculties switched on, the Net can prove to be an incredibly useful research tool. Given the amount of information, analysis and comment that’s out there on the Net, obviously developing the skill of sifting through everything to find what you need to read is a vital pre-requisite. If these skills are developed, then rather than trudging off to a distant library in the vain hope that you might find something useful to your research or writing, it’s right there on your laptop.

The Net also enables people who for various reasons such as impaired mobility cannot be out on the streets, to be able to participate and make a contribution to the overall struggle. Not everyone can or wants to be out on the streets but they will have skills they can contribute ranging from research and writing through to IT, web and graphics that are facilitated by the Net.

Social media plays a vital role in facilitating online communities that help people marginalised for their sexuality, gender identification, etc. to support and empower each other. This is something that’s outside of our lived and political experience so if we’re being honest, it’s not something we’re really qualified to write about in any depth. However, we would welcome contributions from people with experience in this area…

Blogging means every activist can become their own publisher. Which is great but there’s one important caveat – as we know full well from our past experience with the Heckler and our current experience with the Stirrer, you end up preaching to the converted. If we’re being brutally honest, a lot of what we do on the Net takes place in a self selecting bubble of reasonably like minded people. This is where the old school methods of reaching the unconverted such as papers, street meetings and the like have to come into play if we are ever going to make an impact.

Is social media a help or a liability when it comes to organising, protests, actions, etc.?

To be honest, there’s no definitive answer to this question… If we’re talking about a bog standard point A to point B march with the route and arrangement pre-agreed with the authorities, then social media is probably a useful tool in building such an event. Again, with community events such as clean ups, get together, etc., social media has a role in getting the word out. However, with a community orientated event, it’s worth bearing in mind that not everyone is on the Net, particularly the elderly, so if you want to involve the whole community, other methods of promoting an event such as posters, flyers, etc. are pretty much essential.

What about building and organising actions that may well fall foul of the law? Is there a role for social media in this or is it something we should ditch?

Let’s take the example of (some of) the antifascist mobilisation in opposition to the Britain First and EDL marches that took place in central London on April 1st 2017. One anti-fascist group announced the meet up point (in front of the national Gallery) for comrades intending to block the fascists two days in advance on a public Facebook page. The police must have thought Christmas had come early – a feeling enhanced on the day when the aforementioned anti-fascists obligingly identified themselves by turning up dressed in the customary black outfits complete with hoodies! Needless to say, the police were on their case for pretty much the whole day and the Britain First and EDL marches were not blocked. It has to be said that in this instance, it’s not just the indiscriminate use of social media that’s to blame – tactical naïvety from young, inexperienced comrades also played a part in the failure to achieve their stated objective.

The above example was flagged up to show that relying on social media can stymie any action that may be seen by the authorities as as contravening the law. With anything like this, mobilisation has to be done by word of mouth, (secure) telephone trees and encrypted communications if the Net is being used. The point is that even in the age of seemingly ubiquitous social media, there are instances where comrades do still organise militant actions such as occupations using word of mouth and only use the Net to publicise what they’re doing once the action is underway. Depending on the action or protest, social media can be a useful tool in helping to mobilise people with the obvious caveat that if the action is likely to be deemed beyond the pale by the authorities, then extreme caution is needed.

Re-visiting old school methods

The Net has only been around for a relatively short time – events, protests and actions were being conceived and executed for a long, long time before that. It may be worth re-visiting some of the tactics used in the pre-Net era and placing more emphasis on them in an age of ubiquitous social media.

Obviously, there’s a security gain to be made from being more circumspect in the use of social media in building support for a protest…there are other benefits as well to be considered… Old school methods such as street paper sales, street meetings, venue meetings, telephone trees, etc. all involved face to face or voice to voice contact. In the case of street paper sales and meetings, face to face contact had unpredictable outcomes sometimes involving hostility but with sufficient security, risks were minimised or eliminated.

What was important was the intensity of the discussions in these situations – an immersive political experience that cannot be replicated online. If you won someone over with your argument and kept that contact going with a series of contact meetings, a sense of loyalty was built up which ensured commitment to the event that was being built and onto the longer political project. With the best will, in the world, that cannot be replicated by an exchange in an online discussion forum.

Telling the world about what you’ve done on a protest

There are no hard and fast rules about how a protest or action should be documented. We’ve been on housing protests where people have been fairly relaxed about photography and filming and haven’t bothered masking up to avoid being identified by the police. Obviously if someone is stickering a door or setting fire to an effigy then a photo that identifies them doing so which subsequently goes out on social media isn’t exactly welcome. Having said that, most of the photographers we’ve met on housing actions know what the boundaries are and will not put incriminating material out on social media or sell it to a picture library.

When it comes to actions that the authorities deem to be beyond the pale (an ever expanding category these days), or anti-fascist actions then the trend of recording everything for posterity needs to be quashed. We’re sure the naïve people who do this mean no ill but such digital documentation can end up compromising someone’s security if it gets out on the Net – once it’s out, it’s out and there’s no controlling what happens to it. By all means if police brutality is witnessed, record it for the (tactical) purposes of suing them. If the fascists attack, if you can, defend and resist… If you can’t but don’t mind staying in the vicinity, photograph or film the fascists for future intelligence purposes… Whatever you do, DON’T photograph or film us fighting back!

After the episode with the fascists in Dover in January of 2016, there was a heck of a lot of imagery and footage from people ostensibly on our side going up on social media that should have been archived well away from the public gaze and only brought out if needed to defend one of our own. Bragging about stuff after the event can end up as a massive security breach with not just the police taking an interest but the far right as well… If someone is determined enough, they can gather a fair bit of information from people posting on Facebook and other forms of social media – this applies to police and fascists alike…

When setting up an anti-fascist Facebook page, we’ve seen a few where it’s been all too easy to find out the real life person behind that page within a matter of minutes – seriously! Keyboard stuff doesn’t just have keyboard consequences, some of which can be pretty nasty in their own right – it can have serious real life consequences if people aren’t ultra cautious about their online security…

The generational divide

In activist circles there’s an undeniable generational split between a younger generation who’ve had the Net and social media as an integral part of their lives from the time they were born and older activists who can remember a time when we managed to build and organise events using old school, analogue methods. We’re not psychologists but is seems that having the Net and social media as an integral part of your life from birth onwards does result in people perceiving things in a different way to those of us with experience of analogue ways of doing things. We’re willing to be corrected on this but we get the impression that for younger people, the Net and social media is life whereas for older people, generally it’s just another tool to be used as and when appropriate.

We’re not meaning to be judgemental about the way younger activists use the Net and social media – when something becomes an integral part of your life, it’s difficult to avoid it shaping the way you see, think and act. All we’re asking for is the exercise of a certain degree of caution depending on the circumstances and a recognition that old school analogue methods can still play a useful role.


If we’re being honest, when it comes to assessing the impact of the Net and social media on activism, the jury is still out. As a research and publishing tool, it has made a massive and largely positive contribution although it has to be said that as well as digital forms of communication, there’s still a role for papers, flyers and posters in getting the message across.

As a means of building and organising events, actions and protests, the picture is considerably more mixed with a fair bit more in the way of negatives. It’s got to the point where we feel that it’s time for people to take a step back from the screen and think seriously about what the Net and social media can and can’t contribute to activism and ask if there are more effective ways of organising and building actions and events.

As stated at the beginning, this piece is far away from being a definitive statement on what the Net and social media can and can’t contribute to activism. What we want to do is get a healthy debate going and start the process of using the digital tools we have at our disposal in a more considered and security conscious way.